<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Instant Replay in Baseball</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thejohnsonblog.com/2008/06/11/instant-replay-in-baseball/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thejohnsonblog.com/2008/06/11/instant-replay-in-baseball/</link>
	<description>Ramblings of a Computer Geek and his Wife...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 18:38:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: EJ</title>
		<link>http://www.thejohnsonblog.com/2008/06/11/instant-replay-in-baseball/comment-page-1/#comment-66100</link>
		<dc:creator>EJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 15:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejohnsonblog.com/?p=796#comment-66100</guid>
		<description>Just posted to MSNBC yesterday: http://nbcsports.msnbc.com/id/25146939/

Interesting read, reflecting much of what has been commented on here.  I&#039;d love to hear more about the &quot;war-room&quot; and the thinking behind it versus the video being available to the umpires involved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just posted to MSNBC yesterday: <a href="http://nbcsports.msnbc.com/id/25146939/" rel="nofollow">http://nbcsports.msnbc.com/id/25146939/</a></p>
<p>Interesting read, reflecting much of what has been commented on here.  I&#8217;d love to hear more about the &#8220;war-room&#8221; and the thinking behind it versus the video being available to the umpires involved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.thejohnsonblog.com/2008/06/11/instant-replay-in-baseball/comment-page-1/#comment-66075</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 14:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejohnsonblog.com/?p=796#comment-66075</guid>
		<description>I couldn&#039;t agree more.  I hate the idea of instant replay in baseball.  It goes against everything baseball stands for in my opinion.  I always think of the ongoing analogies that compare baseball to life.  You don&#039;t get instant replay in life, and you shouldn&#039;t get it in baseball. 

I also think it&#039;s interesting that we can tolerate the imperfections in our star players.  Derek Jeter can bobble a ball.  Albert Pujols might go 0-4 on a given night.  Brandon Webb might walk 6 batters and lose the game.  But we all just think, &quot;Oh, it&#039;s okay.  Everyone has a rough night.&quot;  But we have a different standard for our umpires, who are just as human and just as likely to make a mistake.  

So much of the joy of baseball is in the human element.  First we have instant replay.  What&#039;s next?  Are we going to install machines to take the home plate umpire&#039;s job and call a consistent strike zone in all 162 games of the season.  That would suck!  I love it that every game, every umpire has a slightly different strike zone and that players have to adjust.  And what would come after a robotic umpire?  Robotic players?  Is it perfection we want, or is it baseball?  The two are quite different.

Unlike Dan, I love baseball.  I think it is one of the truly greatest products of human creativity of all time.  I think it is one of the most perfect sports because of its infallibility.  Because of its human element.  Because it is sometimes messy.  I love that in baseball I&#039;m almost always seeing things I&#039;ve never seen before.  

It&#039;s also interesting that we&#039;re discussing instant replay, which would slow games down, at the same time that Bud Selig is trying to enforce timing rules on players and umpires to make games shorter.  Don&#039;t get me started on that one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree more.  I hate the idea of instant replay in baseball.  It goes against everything baseball stands for in my opinion.  I always think of the ongoing analogies that compare baseball to life.  You don&#8217;t get instant replay in life, and you shouldn&#8217;t get it in baseball. </p>
<p>I also think it&#8217;s interesting that we can tolerate the imperfections in our star players.  Derek Jeter can bobble a ball.  Albert Pujols might go 0-4 on a given night.  Brandon Webb might walk 6 batters and lose the game.  But we all just think, &#8220;Oh, it&#8217;s okay.  Everyone has a rough night.&#8221;  But we have a different standard for our umpires, who are just as human and just as likely to make a mistake.  </p>
<p>So much of the joy of baseball is in the human element.  First we have instant replay.  What&#8217;s next?  Are we going to install machines to take the home plate umpire&#8217;s job and call a consistent strike zone in all 162 games of the season.  That would suck!  I love it that every game, every umpire has a slightly different strike zone and that players have to adjust.  And what would come after a robotic umpire?  Robotic players?  Is it perfection we want, or is it baseball?  The two are quite different.</p>
<p>Unlike Dan, I love baseball.  I think it is one of the truly greatest products of human creativity of all time.  I think it is one of the most perfect sports because of its infallibility.  Because of its human element.  Because it is sometimes messy.  I love that in baseball I&#8217;m almost always seeing things I&#8217;ve never seen before.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s also interesting that we&#8217;re discussing instant replay, which would slow games down, at the same time that Bud Selig is trying to enforce timing rules on players and umpires to make games shorter.  Don&#8217;t get me started on that one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.thejohnsonblog.com/2008/06/11/instant-replay-in-baseball/comment-page-1/#comment-66074</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 13:56:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejohnsonblog.com/?p=796#comment-66074</guid>
		<description>I agree with most of what you&#039;ve stated,  however I would limit it even more.   Possibly on some disputed home run calls . As far as balls and strikes, no way! I agree with Dan as to slowing the game down even more, they could turn into 4 hour affairs.

I advocate using instant replay in playoffs and World Series games only. It&#039;s a shame when games of that magnitude can be lost because of an extremely bad call by an umpire i.e. Don Denkinger in the 1987  World Series. I still have nightmares about that one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with most of what you&#8217;ve stated,  however I would limit it even more.   Possibly on some disputed home run calls . As far as balls and strikes, no way! I agree with Dan as to slowing the game down even more, they could turn into 4 hour affairs.</p>
<p>I advocate using instant replay in playoffs and World Series games only. It&#8217;s a shame when games of that magnitude can be lost because of an extremely bad call by an umpire i.e. Don Denkinger in the 1987  World Series. I still have nightmares about that one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan at BFS</title>
		<link>http://www.thejohnsonblog.com/2008/06/11/instant-replay-in-baseball/comment-page-1/#comment-66070</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan at BFS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 10:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejohnsonblog.com/?p=796#comment-66070</guid>
		<description>I agree. Baseball is a game played by human beings and human beings make mistakes. Easy grounders are booted and fair balls are called foul, it&#039;s all part of the game.

I&#039;m sure that over time someone will figure out an economical way to properly place cameras so that balls and strikes can be called consistently by a computer. But it seems to me that part of the game within the game, for pitchers and batters, is figuring out how a particular umpire is calling pitches. Those smart enough to figure it out the soonest during a game will have earned an advantage, as they should.

I don&#039;t even really like baseball that much, and anything that slows play down further, such as replay, has to be a bad thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. Baseball is a game played by human beings and human beings make mistakes. Easy grounders are booted and fair balls are called foul, it&#8217;s all part of the game.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure that over time someone will figure out an economical way to properly place cameras so that balls and strikes can be called consistently by a computer. But it seems to me that part of the game within the game, for pitchers and batters, is figuring out how a particular umpire is calling pitches. Those smart enough to figure it out the soonest during a game will have earned an advantage, as they should.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t even really like baseball that much, and anything that slows play down further, such as replay, has to be a bad thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

